Salem 78·Park City 90·Leavenworth 72·St. George 71·Alexandria 61·Bozeman 79·New Glarus 72·Billings 75·Medora 80·Detroit Lakes 68·Bentonville 71·Cedar City 67·Mackinac 66·Pella 74·Glenwood 80·Anoka 68·Salem 78·Park City 90·Leavenworth 72·St. George 71·Alexandria 61·Bozeman 79·New Glarus 72·Billings 75·Medora 80·Detroit Lakes 68·Bentonville 71·Cedar City 67·Mackinac 66·Pella 74·Glenwood 80·Anoka 68·

The idea

A field study, updated weekly. We grade small tourism towns on one honest rubric, then publish what we find.

The problem

Good towns go unfound

A town does not lose visitors because it lacks charm. It loses them because travelers cannot find it, picture it, or choose it.

The instrument

One small rubric

Seven weighted categories and a Unique Hook multiplier, scored on a single afternoon, the same questions asked of every town.

The discipline

Read it as a budget

The score is a position, not a verdict. The category just below the composite is where the next dollar goes.

What we believe

A flawed town with one unrepeatable thing beats a pleasant town that could be anywhere.

Six years of fieldwork across more than forty towns converged on eight observable qualities that explain a tourism outcome the others cannot. We keep the corpus open, the rubric small, and the voice honest.

Read the method

Find out where your town stands.

The towns that win the next decade get serious about their story now.

Request your Visitor Impact Score